Category: D.G.Rancourt

  • “Unintended Consequences” of the COVID-19 Lockdown: Millions of People in the Poorest Areas of the World Died of Starvation, Not COVID-19/ By Carla Stea

    “Unintended Consequences” of the COVID-19 Lockdown: Millions of People in the Poorest Areas of the World Died of Starvation, Not COVID-19/ By Carla Stea

    People whose deaths were irrelevant, and Ignored by the Mainstream Media

    Global Research, June 22, 2025

    Original Link Here: “Unintended Consequences” of the COVID-19 Lockdown: Millions of People in the Poorest Areas of the World Died of Starvation, Not COVID-19 – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

    “The End of Free Speech is the End of Science.” — Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

    In a brilliant and powerfully moving speech at the James Madison Program at Princeton University, April 14, 2024, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, currently Director of the National Institutes of Health, described the horrific suffering of the most vulnerable people, and  people throughout the poorest areas of the world, as the result of the Covid-19 lockdown’s shattering of the  methods by which these destitute people survived.

    These poorest populations became unable to live, as the result of the draconian destruction of their way of life by the useless coerced lockdown, crippling their lives, and caging them at whatever constituted their “home,” destroying their ability to sustain their subsistence living, condemning them to starvation. 

    The following three paragraphs are brief, verbatim passages of this extraordinary speech.

    “In the Spring of 2020 you have a situation that is in my view the most classist policy I have ever seen in my life.  I called it a trickle down epidemiology, but the theory is that somehow if we make the poor suffer, we can all (“all” meaning the relatively well off) benefit. Among the first thoughts I had during the early days of the lockdown was this lockdown is going to kill a tremendous number of people in the poorest parts of the world, and it did.  This was the first day of the lockdown in India in March, 2020.  The consequence of the economic devastation caused by the lockdowns:  I could just see it in February, 2020, when I first started hearing about lockdowns, and by March, 2020 when the lockdowns were put in place it was going to lead to the starvation of mass numbers of people, it was going to lead to mass poverty and mass death, and it did.  This was the first day of the lockdown in India in March of 2020, on the advice of people like Antony Fauci.  There were a half billion migrant workers living in the big cities of India:  they make their living by day to day selling coconuts to rich people on the street, and that represents their entire wealth. They take the money from the coconut sales, buy coconuts for the next day and they feed their families with the rest.  So lockdown meant they couldn’t sell their coconuts, and that means their life savings was gone.  The Prime Minister of India said you have to go back to your home Villages;  the Indian infrastructure is not set up to move a half billion people in a single day and so a half billion people found some way, sometimes by train, sometimes by bike, sometimes by walking up to a thousand miles, and on the day the lockdown happened a thousand people died that day from the lockdown order.”

    “I think it was February, 2022, Uganda reopened schools after the longest closure in the world due to the lockdown:  for most students it was the first time back in the classroom in nearly two years;  15 million kids out of school means those kids do not have basic human capital to learn how to do jobs that will allow them to lead healthy productive lives, and 4 ½ million of those kids never came back from those closed schools and were just gone, lost to follow up.  This story is not just unique to Uganda.  In the Philippines they had a policy that not only kept the kids out of school, but wouldn’t let kids out of the house for two years, so you had kids born in the Philippines that didn’t see the light of day for two years.  The impact, again, on the global south is almost impossible to exaggerate.  What we’re talking about is a tide of generational inequality, a tide of poverty that we should have cared about.  The most heartbreaking thing, and this is from a UN Office of Drugs and Crime in 2021, is why some of those kids stayed out of school for so long and never came back.  We put families in the place where they had to choose between what I’m about to describe, and starvation; and a lot of families chose this:  the reason why a lot of those kids never came back was that their families sold their children into sexual slavery or to child labor.  The effects of the pandemic lockdown on children have been far reaching, with children trafficked for sexual exploitation, forced marriage, forced begging and forced criminality.  What we have is an utter human rights catastrophe that happened, with the public health authorities of this country  perfectly happy to sign on, and its not like I’m giving you fringe reports:  these are reports of UNICEF…They’re screaming as loud as they can and we’re just ignoring them.”

    READ MORE: Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. Academic Hostility. Coordinated Suppression of the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD)

    “This was an incredibly shortsighted policy, but you couldn’t get anybody to listen, and pointing this out was a very difficult thing in 2020:  it’s not just that you couldn’t get anybody to listen, but when you said it you were subject to, and I know this from personal experience, you’re subjected to vicious attacks.  I could go on literally for hours and hours and hours to show you the collateral harm:  there isn’t a single aspect of human well being that was not damaged significantly by the policy of lockdown, especially for the poorest people, especially for the most vulnerable.  UNICEF put out an estimate that 150 million additional children were plunged into poverty due to – again they always say covid-19, but in fact it’s the economic policies adopted to address covid-19 that were the cause of the impoverishment.”

    In addition to his MD from Stanford University, Dr. Bhattacharya holds a PhD in Economics from Stanford, and is uniquely qualified to assess the disastrous economic consequences, globally, as a result of the Covid-19 lockdown.  But his dissent from the orthodox policies inflicted, globally, by the de facto dictatorship of Dr. Fauci, and the groveling medical establishment in lockstep with him, and Dr. Bhattacharya’s refusal to opportunistically conform to this dangerous orthodoxy led to his ostracism, and he endured death threats both to himself and his wife.  It is terrifying to learn that dissent from conformity in the United States, which boasts “freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association as inalienable rights,”  in deplorable reality this society demands obedience to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth, suffocating thought, as the punishment for dissent is often more deadly than is the so-called Covid-19 virus.

    On October 3, 2020, Dr. Bhattacharya co-authored the “Great Barrington Declaration,” together with Professor Sunetra Gupta, an epidemiologist at Oxford and Harvard Professor, Dr. Martin Kulldorff.  The hysterical response from the orthodox medical establishment was similar to the hysteria of the Vatican when Galileo committed the heresy of contradicting the Vatican’s false orthodoxy. 

    The Declaration was signed by 941,261 expert Medical and Public Health Scientists throughout the world.  The signatories included Dr. Michael Levitt, recipient of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.  But the force and truth of this Declaration was so great that the orthodox medical establishment, especially Dr. Fauci, regarded by some as the Pope, and Dr. Francis Collins connived to smear, discredit and entirely eviscerate the scientific experts who had promulgated it. The fact that the Declaration had the advantage of providing solid fact, and offered enormous benefit to the public was irrelevant to the fallacious orthodoxy being perpetrated by Fauci and Collins. In collusion, the two engaged in defamatory actions reminiscent of gangster tactics, concealing alarming  facts, especially the numerous serious adverse and sometimes fatal reactions to the vaccine, which the public needed to know to enable them to make “informed consent” to relevant medical treatment.

    When the Covid-19 vaccine became available, it was mandated, though inadequately tested, with innumerable adverse reactions to the vaccine denied, or egregiously ignored to the extent that the mandate, which violated the Nuremberg Code, the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Bioethics, bears terrifying similarity to the  forced medical experiments infamously carried out during World War II.  With vaccine manufacturers given liability protection, the public was, in essence, guinea pigs.

    Several centuries ago, in Salem Massachusetts, there was a witch hunt, and persons accused of witchcraft were frequently put to death.  Less than a century ago McCarthyism terrorized American citizens, and millions of lives were damaged or destroyed by the mere  accusation, or even the suggestion that they were Communists, or Communist sympathizers.  And, more recently, anyone questioning the “official” Covid-19 policies became “suspect,” shunned, and often socially excommunicated. Where is freedom of speech, or even freedom of thought? Without the right to dissent,  self-censorship becomes a survival tactic, thought processes atrophy, and a nation of docile, unimaginative robots is born. We are alarmingly close to that, and it is only the appointment of bravest persons such as Dr. Jay Battacharya to the Directorship of the National Institute of Health that provides an example that persons of great courage and integrity may prevail.

    But, perhaps it is the sincerity of Dr. Bhattacharya’s commitment to the equality of all, the value of each person, and his concern for the needs of the most vulnerable and the poorest lives on our planet, in addition to those financially better off, or the “elites,” that distinguishes him, elevating him to the highest ethical level, worthy of his profession as physician and authority of health policy, and as noble human being.

    *

    Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

    Carla Stea is Global Research’s correspondent at United Nations Headquarters, New York, N.Y.

    Featured image: Dr. Bhattacharya at his confirmation hearing (Public Domain)


    Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.


    Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

    Become a Member of Global Research

     

  • Spatiotemporal Variation of Excess All-cause Mortality in the World (125 countries) During the COVID Period 2020-2023 Regarding Socio-Economic Factors and Public Health and Medical Interventions/By Prof Denis Rancourt, Dr. Joseph Hickey, and Prof. Christian Linard

    Spatiotemporal Variation of Excess All-cause Mortality in the World (125 countries) During the COVID Period 2020-2023 Regarding Socio-Economic Factors and Public Health and Medical Interventions/By Prof Denis Rancourt, Dr. Joseph Hickey, and Prof. Christian Linard

    Original Link Here:

    Spatiotemporal Variation of Excess All-cause Mortality in the World (125 countries) During the COVID Period 2020-2023 Regarding Socio-Economic Factors and Public Health and Medical Interventions
    Global Research, July 23, 2024
    Correlation 19 July 2024

    Summary

    We studied all-cause mortality in 125 countries with available all-cause mortality data by time (week or month), starting several years prior to the declared pandemic, and for up to and more than three years of the Covid period (2020-2023). The studied countries are on six continents and comprise approximately 35 % of the global population (2.70 billion of 7.76 billion, in 2019).

    The overall excess all-cause mortality rate in the 93 countries with sufficient data in the 3-year period 2020-2022 is 0.392 ± 0.002 % of 2021 population, which is comparable to the historic rate of approximately 0.97 % of population over the course of the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic.

    The overall excess all-cause mortality rate in the 93 countries with sufficient data in the 3-year period 2020-2022 is 0.392 ± 0.002 % of 2021 population, which is comparable to the historic rate of approximately 0.97 % of population over the course of the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic.

    By comparison, India (which is not included in the present study) had an April-July 2021 peak in excess all-cause mortality of 3.7 million deaths for its 2021 population of approximately 1.41 billion, which corresponds to an excess death rate of 0.26 % for 2021 alone (Rancourt, 2022).

    Our calculated excess mortality rate (0.392 ± 0.002 %) corresponds to 30.9 ± 0.2 million excess deaths projected to have occurred globally for the 3-year period 2020-2022, from all causes of excess mortality during this period.

    We also calculate the population-wide risk of death per injection (vDFR) by dose number (1st dose, 2nd dose, boosters) (actually, by time period), and by age (in a subset of European countries). Using the median value of all-ages vDFR for 2021-2022 for the 78 countries with sufficient data gives an estimated projected global all-ages excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts up to 30 December 2022: 16.9 million COVID-19-vaccine-associated deaths.

    Large differences in excess all-cause mortality rate (by population) and in age-and-health-status-adjusted (P-score) mortality are incompatible with a viral pandemic spread hypothesis and are strongly associated with the combination (product) of share of population that is elderly (60+ years) and share of population living in poverty.

    There are large North-South (Canada-USA-Mexico) differences in North America, and large East-West differences in Europe, which are due to large national jurisdictional differences, or discontinuities in socio-economic and institutional conditions. Such systematic differences in mortality and underlying structure are captured by hierarchical cluster analysis using a panel of (yearly) time series, including to some extent the likelihood of persistent excess all-cause mortality into 2023.

    Excluding borderline cases, 28 countries (of 79 countries with sufficient data, 35 % of countries) have a high statistical certainty of persistent and significant excess all-cause mortality into 2023, compared to the extrapolated pre-Covid historic trend, excluding excess all-cause mortality from peak residuals extending out from 2022, and excluding accidentally large values: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom, and USA. More research is needed to elucidate this phenomenon.

    The spatiotemporal variations in national excess all-cause mortality rates allow us to conclude that the Covid-period (2020-2023) excess all-cause mortality in the world is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease as a primary cause of death. This hypothesis, although believed to be supported by testing campaigns, should be abandoned.

    Inconsistencies that disprove the hypothesis of a viral respiratory pandemic to explain excess all-cause mortality during the Covid period are seen on a global scale and include the following.

    • Near-synchronicity of onset, across several continents, of surges in excess mortality occurring immediately when a pandemic is declared by the WHO (11 March 2020), and never prior to pandemic announcement in any country
    • Excessively large country-to-country heterogeneity of the age-and-health-status-adjusted (P-score) mortality during the Covid period, including across shared borders between adjacent countries, and including in all time periods down to half years
    • Highly time variable age-and-health-status-adjusted (P-score) mortality in individual countries during and after the Covid period, including more-than-year-long periods of zero excess mortality, long-duration plateaus or regimes of high excess mortality, single peaks versus many recurring peaks, and persistent high excess mortality after a pandemic is declared to have ended (5 May 2023)
    • Strong correlations (all-country scatter plots) between excess all-cause mortality rates and socio-economic factors (esp. measures of poverty) change with time (by year and half year) during the Covid period, between diametrically opposite values (near-zero, large and positive, large and negative) of the Pearson correlation coefficient (e.g., Figure 29, first half of 2020 to first half of 2023)

    One might tentatively add:

    • No evidence of the large vaccine rollouts ever being associated with reductions in excess all-cause mortality, in any country (and see Rancourt and Hickey, 2023)
    • Exponential increases with age in excess all-cause mortality rate (by population), consistent with age-dominant frailty rather than infection in the limit of high virulence

    We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) the Covid period are:

    1. Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes
    2. Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)
    3. COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations

    In all cases ― for all three identified primary causes of death ― a proximal or clinical cause of death associated (such as on death certificates) with the quantified excess all-cause mortality is respiratory condition or infection. Therefore, we distinguish (and define) true primary causes of death from the pervasive and accompanying proximal or clinical cause of death as respiratory.

    We understand the Covid-period mortality catastrophe to be precisely what happens when governments cause global disruptions and assaults against populations. We emphasize the importance of biological stress from sudden and profound structural societal changes and of medical assaults (including denial of treatment for bacterial pneumonias, repeated vaccine injections, etc.). We estimate that such a campaign of disruptions and assaults in a modern world will produce a global all-ages mortality rate of >0.1 % of population per year, as was also the case in the 1918 mortality catastrophe.

    Introduction

    All-cause mortality by time and by administrative jurisdiction is arguably the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause. Such data can be collected by national or state jurisdiction or subdivision, by age, by sex, by location of death, and so on. It is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death in the mortality itself (see many references in Rancourt et al., 2023a).

    Rancourt and collaborators have studied all-cause mortality for many jurisdictions, while developing the analytic approaches:

    • several, esp. USA (Rancourt, 2020);
    • France (Rancourt et al., 2020);
    • India (Rancourt, 2022);
    • USA (Rancourt et al., 2021a, 2022b);
    • Canada (Rancourt et al., 2021b, 2022c);
    • Australia (Rancourt et al., 2022a, 2023b);
    • 17 countries in the Southern Hemisphere (Rancourt et al., 2023a);
    • Israel (Rancourt et al., 2023b);
    • world, with respect to COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (Rancourt and Hickey, 2023).

    Researchers at CORRELATION and collaborators continue to be engaged in a broad research program of all-cause mortality and its associations with various factors.

    Here we study all-cause mortality in 125 countries with available all-cause mortality data by time (week or month). The studied countries are on six continents and comprise approximately 35 % of the global population (2.70 billion of 7.76 billion, in 2019).

    Large countries which are notably excluded for lack of available data include China (1.41 billion in 2019), India (1.38 billion in 2029), Indonesia, Pakistan, and most countries in Africa, although India has previously been studied (Rancourt, 2022; and references therein).

    See the Summary for an overview.

    Click here to read the full report.

    *

    Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    Spread the Truth, Refer a Friend to Global Research 

    Featured image is from NaturalNews.com

     

    READ MORE:

    New Study of 125 Countries Finds No Evidence COVID Vaccines Provided ‘Any Benefit’

  • Corona: 5 Official Facts/ By Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg

    Corona: 5 Official Facts/ By Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg

     

    Microsoft Word – Corona Facts.docx (stefan-homburg.de)

    Corona: Five Official Facts
    Dezember 2023
    Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg

    This document uses short links. If you click on one of the blue links or type it in
    manually, the official URL will appear in your browser window.

    1. All-time low clinic occupancy in 2020
    In 2020, clinic occupancy fell to an all-time low, in some cases 30% below the previous year’s figure. Link Bundesgesundheitsministerium (p. 4): https://bitly.ws/32cQN

    2. Few severe respiratory diseases
    Respiratory diseases were inconspicuous in 2020 and 2021. Peaks occurred in 2018
    and at the end of 2022. Link Robert Koch-Institut (p. 5): https://bitly.ws/32cSF

    3. Deaths increased noticeably in 2021 not 2020
    In 2020, the age-adjusted mortality rate was between the values of 2018 and 2019.
    It only increased noticeably with the start of vaccination in 2021. Link Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes: https://bitly.ws/342bx

    4. Corona deaths were older than other deaths
    On average, the PCR deaths were 83 years old, the other deaths were 82 years old.
    Links Robert Koch-Institut (p. 19): https://bitly.ws/32pqh und Bundesinstitut für
    Bevölkerungsforschung: https://bitly.ws/32cTK

    5. Sweden performed better than Germany
    The overall mortality rate per capita was lower in lockdown- and mask-free Sweden
    than in Germany. Link: World Health Organization: https://bitly.ws/32sSY

     

    READ MORE:

    Corona-Symposium in the German Bundestag – Emotional Presentation of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (rumble.com)

  • Canadian Government Admits 48,780 Excess Deaths in 2022 (17% Increase in Mortality). There Is No Evidence COVID-19 Vaccines Saved a Single Life in Canada During 2021-2022/By Dr. William Makis

    Canadian Government Admits 48,780 Excess Deaths in 2022 (17% Increase in Mortality). There Is No Evidence COVID-19 Vaccines Saved a Single Life in Canada During 2021-2022/By Dr. William Makis

    Global Research, December 28, 2023

    All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

    To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

    Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    ***

    Nov. 27, 2023 – Statistics Canada released a fascinating report called “Deaths 2022”. Here is my analysis of the report.

     

     

    The Statistics Canada Report can be accessed HERE.

    Excess deaths:

    • Let’s start by analyzing some simple numbers.
    • 48,780 excess deaths in 2022 compared to 2019. 17% increase in mortality.
    • That’s 0.128% of the population, or 1 in every 784 Canadians died in 2022.
    • In USA, that would be equivalent to 423,270 American deaths

    What would you do?

    • Let’s assume you’re the Trudeau government and you’ve poisoned your population.
    • You recommended 7 experimental COVID-19 Vaccines that are now causing heart attacks, blood clots, collapses, cancers & sudden deaths.
    • These are the COVID-19 Vaccines the Canadian Government (NACI) recommended:
    • If you followed the Canadian government recommendations precisely, you would have taken 7 COVID-19 Vaccines as of right now.
    • It was also possible to skip the 2nd booster and wait for the Omicron bivalent, which means you would have taken 6 COVID-19 Vaccines.
    • We know that there is a tsunami of sudden deaths in the COVID-19 Vaccinated, but how do you present that data as the Federal Government?

    What caused 48,780 deaths in 2022?

    • 19,700 deaths from “COVID-19” in 2022, up from 15,900 in 2020.
    • And this after 7 COVID-19 Vaccines recommended by NACI.
    • This is proof that COVID-19 Vaccines did not save a single life.
    • It’s important to remember that 80% of COVID-19 deaths in 2020 in Canada were found to be in long term care home settings (source), where vulnerable seniors were often left to die without adequate treatment (like antibiotics), or were given euthanasia drug cocktails (midazolam, morphine).
    • So most COVID-19 deaths in 2020 were not true COVID-19 deaths.
    • In terms of vaccines protecting from “severe disease”, where is this protection on the graph below? I don’t see any protection in 2021. Hospitalizations were similar in 2021 compared to 2020.
    • Now look at what happened after COVID-19 mRNA 1st booster shots were rolled out in Nov-Dec.2021. This was followed by massive Omicron spikes in 2022 in Jan (BA.1), March (BA.2), July (BA.5), October (BA.5+).
    • Again, where is this “protection from severe illness” promised by the vaccines?
    • There is once again no evidence of vaccines protecting people in 2022.

    • Even if we accept 19,700 deaths from COVID-19 in 2022, who was dying?
    • BC government data (just before they deleted it in July 2022) told us 90% of those dying were Vaccinated.
    • So 17,730 of the 19,700 deaths (90%) were COVID-19 Vaccinated anyways.
    • Therefore, either:
      • they died from a COVID-19 Vaccine Injury and it was falsely reported as a COVID-19 death, or
      • they died from failure of their COVID-19 Vaccine (and likely Immune system injury) and they died from COVID-19.
    • Any way you dissect it, these 19,700 “COVID-19 deaths” are really COVID-19 Vaccine deaths.
    • Where is the 99% or 95% COVID-19 Vaccine efficacy we were promised?

    Unspecified causes of deaths:

    • 16,043, a stunning 375% increase from 2019 when it was 3,378!
    • This is the most stunning admission from the entire report.
    • This is also the number that has been circulated extensively on social media
    • We don’t actually get any plausible explanation for this number in the entire report.

    Cardiac

    • Cardiac deaths increased by 4,000.
    • This is a significant number, although I suspect many cardiac deaths are hidden in the “unspecified” or “COVID-19” death categories.

    Accidents (Unintentional injuries)

    • 18,365, up almost 3,000 from 2019 (15,527)
    • I’m guessing they’re hiding blood clots here (strokes, falls, medical emergency while driving, etc)

    Cancer

    • Turbo Cancer due to COVID-19 Vaccines is a signal they have to hide at all costs.
    • I’m not surprised to see only a small rise from 80,400 to 82,400, or +2000
    • This is a number that is undoubtedly tampered with.
    • It would be very easy to hide cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths.

    Statistics Canada:

    Life expectancy decreases for a third year in a row”.

    • the important detail: “In 2022, the decline was more prominent among females than among males”.
    • more women are vaccine injured than men.
    • women are losing life expectancy in Canada at faster rate than men.

    “COVID-19 deaths…This increase may in part be due to the exposure to new highly transmissible COVID-19 variants and the gradual return to normalcy, eg. reduced restrictions and masking requirements

    • Translation: 19,700 7x-vaccinated Canadians died from COVID-19 because of the milder new variants, no lockdowns and they stopped masking.
    • this explanation makes NO SENSE – if their vaccine protected them, they wouldn’t need lockdowns, wouldn’t need masks that don’t work, and they certainly wouldn’t be dying from milder variants.
    • so Statistics Canada has NO EXPLANATION for these 19,700 deaths.

    Deaths due to influenza and pneumonia on the rise

    • deaths due to influenza and pneumonia increased by 45.4% from 2021 to 2022
    • I’ve often talked about this, this is due to COVID-19 Vaccine Immune damage.

    “information on the causes of death, particularly among younger Canadians, whose deaths are more likely to result in an investigation, typically requires more time before it is reported to Statistics Canada…the data released today are preliminary

    • they’re telling us that we’re not getting all the young Canadian sudden deaths in this report.
    • So the 48,700 Excess deaths doesn’t include an unknown number of “younger Canadians” who died suddenly.

    My Take…

    Statistics Canada “Deaths 2022” is data that you can reasonably expect has been thoroughly manipulated and tampered with.

    It’s “preliminary” and doesn’t include many “younger Canadians” who died suddenly.

    Even so, it is a devastating report.

    48,780 Excess deaths in 2022 (17% increase in mortality).

    I propose that the vast majority of these are COVID-19 Vaccine deaths.

    These COVID-19 vaccine deaths are being concealed as:

    • 19,716 COVID-19 deaths (not possible)
    • 16,043 Unspecified causes (no explanation given or even attempted)
    • the remaining 12,000 or so they’re not hiding:
      • 4,000 Cardiac
      • 3,000 Accidents
      • 2,000 Cancers
      • 800 liver disease
      • 500 kidney disease
      • 500 diabetes

    A reminder that 1 in every 784 Canadians died in 2022, as admitted by the Canadian government in this Nov.27, 2023 Statistics Canada report.

    This is very much in line with Denis Rancourt’s work on excess deaths due to COVID-19 Vaccination.

    This is what I wrote in my very first substack article on Feb.6, 2023:

    “A good quick rule of thumb is: highly COVID vaccinated countries lost0.1% of their total population to “excess deaths” in 2022. That’s 1 in every 1000 people, dead.”

    Statistics Canada corrected me. Not 1 in 1000.

    Worse. 1 in 784.

    *

    Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications.

    Featured image is from Michael Nevradakis, PhD via COVID Intel


    The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

    by Michel Chossudovsky

    Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

    “My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

    Reviews

    This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon

    In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia

    In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig

    Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac

    A reading of  Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late.  You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin

    READ MORE: 

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/genocide-government-reports-pfizer-documents-reveal-sinister-agenda-depopulate-covid-vaccination/5834966?doing_wp_cron=1706143942.4575591087341308593750

    ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0,  Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook,  Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

    Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.

    We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.

  • There Was No Pandemic. Dr. Denis Rancourt

    There Was No Pandemic. Dr. Denis Rancourt

    Global Research, July 26, 2023
    Denis Rancourt 22 June 2023

    All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

    To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

    Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    ***

    This is radical.

    The essay is based on my May 17, 2023 testimony for the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony, and our continued research.

    I am an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa.

    I have written over 30 scientific reports relevant to COVID, starting April 18, 2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca/covid), and recently for a new non-profit corporation (correlation‑canada.org/research). Presently, all my work and interviews about COVID are documented on my website created to circumvent the barrage of censorship (denisrancourt.ca).

    In addition to critical reviews of published science, the main data that my collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality.

    All-cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race, living accomodations) is the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause.

    Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We have used it to detect and characterize seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars, population aging, long-term societal development, and societal assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many countries around the world, and over recent history, 1900-present.

    Interestingly, none of the post-second-world-war Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-promoted (CDC‑promoted) viral respiratory disease pandemics (1957-58, “H2N2”; 1968, “H3N2”; 2009, “H1N1 again”) can be detected in the all‑cause mortality of any country. Unlike all the other causes of death that are known to affect mortality, these so‑called pandemics did not cause any detectable increase in mortality, anywhere.

    The large 1918 mortality event, which was recruited to be a textbook viral respiratory disease pandemic (“H1N1”), occurred prior to the inventions of antibiotics and the electron microscope, under horrific post-war public-sanitation and economic-stress conditions. The 1918 deaths have been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to have been caused by bacterial pneumonia. This is shown in several independent and non-contested published studies.

    My first report analysing all-cause mortality was published on June 2, 2020, at censorship-prone Research Gate, and was entitled “All-cause mortality during COVID-19 – No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”. It showed that hot spots of sudden surges in all‑cause mortality occurred only in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World, which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a pandemic. Such synchronicity is impossible within the presumed framework of a spreading viral respiratory disease, with or without airplanes, because the calculated time from seeding to mortality surge is highly dependent on local societal circumstances, by several months to years. I attributed the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in those localities.

    The work was pursued in greater depth with collaborators for several years and continues. We have shown repeatedly that excess mortality most often refused to cross national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus targets the poor and disabled and carries a passport. It also never kills until governments impose socio-economic and care-structure transformations on vulnerable groups within the domestic population.

    Here are my conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

    1. If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality
    2. There was no pandemic causing excess mortality
    3. Measures caused excess mortality
    4. COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality

    Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

    In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents. In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years and older. We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.

    If one accepts my above-numbered conclusions, and the analyses that we have performed, then there are several implications about how one perceives reality regarding what actually did and did not occur.

    First, whereas epidemics of fatal infections are very real in care homes, in hospitals, and with degenerate living conditions, the viral respiratory pandemic risk promoted by the USA‑led “pandemic response” industry is not a thing. It is most likely fabricated and maintained for ulterior motives, other than saving humanity.

    Second, in addition to natural events (heat waves, earthquakes, extended large-scale droughts), significant events that negatively affect mortality are large assaults against domestic populations, affecting vulnerable residents, such as:

    • sudden devastating economic deterioration (the Great Depression, the dust bowl, the dissolution of the Soviet Union),
    • war (including social-class restructuring),
    • imperial or economic occupation and exploitation (including large-scale exploitative land use), and
    • the well-documented measures and destruction applied during the COVID period.

    Otherwise, in a stable society, mortality is extremely robust and is not subject to large rapid changes. There is no empirical evidence that large changes in mortality can be induced by sudden appearances of new pathogens. In the contemporary era of the dominant human species, humanity is its worst enemy, not nature.

    Third, coercive measures imposed to reduce the risk of transmission (such as distancing, direction arrows, lockdown, isolation, quarantine, Plexiglas barriers, face shields and face masks, elbow bumps, etc.) are palpably unscientific; and the underlying concern itself regarding “spread” was not ever warranted and is irrational, since there is no evidence in reliable mortality data that there ever was a particularly virulent pathogen.

    In fact, the very notion of “spread” during the COVID period is rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is sufficiently quantified, worldwide. For example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and disabled residents of the USA did not cross the more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada, despite continuous and intense economic exchanges. Likewise, the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality hotspots in March-April-May 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those hotspots.

    Interestingly, in this regard, the historical seasonal variations (12 month period) in all-cause mortality, known for more than 100 years, are inverted in the northern and southern global hemispheres, and show no evidence of “spread” whatsoever. Instead, these patterns, in a given hemisphere, show synchronous increases and decreases of mortality across the entire hemisphere. Would the “spreading” causal agent(s) always take exactly 6 months to cross into the other hemisphere, where it again causes mortality changes that are synchronous across the hemisphere? Many epidemiologists have long-ago concluded that person-to-person “contact” spreading of respiratory diseases cannot explain and is disproved by the seasonal patterns of all-cause mortality. Why the CDC et al. are not systematically ridiculed in this regard is beyond this scientist’s comprehension.

    Instead, outside of extremely poor living conditions, we should look to the body of work produced by Professor Sheldon Cohen and co‑authors (USA) who established that two dominant factors control whether intentionally challenged college students become infected and the severity of the respiratory illness when they are infected:

    • degree of experienced psychological stress
    • degree of social isolation

    The negative impact of experienced psychological stress on the immune system is a large current and established area of scientific study, dutifully ignored by vaccine interests, and we now know that the said impact is dramatically larger in elderly individuals, where nutrition (gut biome ecology) is an important co-factor.

    Of course, I do not mean that causal agents do not exist, such as bacteria, which can cause pneumonia; nor that there are not dangerous environmental concentrations of such causal agents in proximity to fragile individuals, such as in hospitals and on clinicians’ hands, notoriously.

    Fourth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, the debate about gain-of-function research and an escaped bioweapon is irrelevant.

    I do not mean that the Department of Defence (DoD) does not fund gain-of-function and bioweapon research (abroad, in particular), I do not mean that there are not many US patents for genetically modified microbial organisms having potential military applications, and I do not mean that there have not previously been impactful escapes or releases of bioweapon vectors and pathogens. For example, the Lyme disease controversy in the USA may be an example of a bioweapon leak (see Kris Newby’s 2019 book “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons”).

    Generally, for obvious reasons, any pathogen that is extremely virulent will not also be extremely contagious. There are billions of years of cumulative evolutionary pressures against the existence of any such pathogen, and that result will be deeply encoded into all lifeforms.

    Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to vehemently seek to create such a pathogen. Bioweapons are intended to be delivered to specific target areas, except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely contagious can be reliably delivered to one’s own population and soldiers.

    In my view, if anything COVID is close to being a bioweapon, it is the military capacity to massively, and repeatedly, rollout individual injections, which are physical vectors for whichever substances the regime wishes to selectively inject into chosen populations, while imposing complete compliance down to one’s own body, under the cover of protecting public health.

    This is the same regime that practices wars of complete nation destruction and societal annihilation, under the cover of spreading democracy and women’s rights. And I do not mean China.

    Fifth, again, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no need for any special treatment protocols, beyond the usual thoughtful, case-by-case, diagnostics followed by the clinician’s chosen best approach.

    Instead, vicious new protocols killed patients in hotspots that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.

    This was followed in many states by imposed coercive societal measures, which were contrary to individual health: fear, panic, paranoia, induced psychological stress, social isolation, self-victimization, loss of work and volunteer activity, loss of social status, loss of employment, business bankruptcy, loss of usefulness, loss of caretakers, loss of venues and mobility, suppression of freedom of expression, etc.

    Only the professional class did better, comfortably working from home, close to family, while being catered to by an army of specialised home-delivery services.

    Unfortunately, the medical establishment did not limit itself to assaulting and isolating vulnerable patients in hospitals and care facilities. It also systematically withdrew normal care, and attacked physicians who refused to do so.

    In virtually the entire Western World, antibiotic prescriptions were cut and maintained low by approximately 50% of the pre-COVID rates. This would have had devastating effects in the USA, in particular, where:

    • the CDC’s own statistics, based on death certificates, has approximately 50% of the million or so deaths associated with COVID having bacterial pneumonia as a listed comorbidity (there was a massive epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the USA, which no one talked about)
    • the Southern poor states historically have much higher antibiotic prescription rates (this implies high susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia)
    • excess mortality during the COVID period is very strongly correlated (r = +0.86) — in fact proportional to — state-wise poverty

    Sixth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no public-health reason to develop and deploy vaccines; not even if one accepted the tenuous proposition that any vaccine has ever been effective against a presumed viral respiratory disease.

    Add to this that all vaccines are intrinsically dangerous and our above-described vaccine-dose fatality rate quantifications, and we must recognize that the vaccines contributed significantly to excess mortality everywhere that they were imposed.

    In conclusion, the excess mortality was not caused by any particularly virulent new pathogen. COVID so-called response in-effect was a massive multi-pronged state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.

    It is only natural now to ask “what drove this?”, “who benefited?” and “which groups sustained permanent structural disadvantages?”

    In my view, the COVID assault can only be understood in the symbiotic contexts of geopolitics and large-scale social-class transformations. Dominance and exploitation are the drivers. The failing USA-centered global hegemony and its machinations create dangerous conditions for virtually everyone.

    *

    Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    Prof. Denis Rancourt, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca), denis.rancourt@alumni.utoronto.ca

    Featured image source


    The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

    by Michel Chossudovsky

    Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

    “My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

    ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0,  Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook,  Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

    Price: $11.50 Get yours for FREE! Click here to download.

    We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page

  • Dr. Denis Rancourt: COVID Injections Have Killed 13 Million People Worldwide/ By Rhoda Wilson

    Dr. Denis Rancourt: COVID Injections Have Killed 13 Million People Worldwide/ By Rhoda Wilson

     

    Global Research, July 06, 2023
    The Expose 26 June 2023

     

    All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

    To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

    Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    ***

    Dr. Denis Rancourt’s research has shown that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents.  And, “in Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2,000 injections, to increase exponentially with age … We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide,” he said.

    Denis Rancourt has a PhD in physics. He held post-doctoral research positions at prestigious institutions in France and The Netherlands, before being a physics professor and lead scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years. He has written over 30 scientific reports relevant to covid, starting 18 April  2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association and for a new non-profit organisation called Correlation. Presently, all his work and interviews about covid are documented on his website which he created to circumvent the barrage of censorship.  You can follow Dr. Rancourt on Twitter HERE.

    On 17 May, Dr. Rancourt testified at the National Citizens Inquiry (“NCI”) held in Ontario, Canada.  NCI is a citizen-led inquiry into Canada’s covid-19 response.

    In a Twitter thread with video clips attached, citizen researcher and journalist Ben M., who is maintaining data through projects such as Mortality Watch,  highlighted the following statements made by Dr. Rancourt during his testimony.

    “There’s a strong correlation to poverty, which is one of the pieces of evidence that allows you to say that this is not a virus. [..] No matter how you slice it, there’s absolutely no correlation with age, which is definitive proof that this cannot be covid.”

    Ben M. on Twitter

    “During the covid period, all western countries cut antibiotics prescriptions by 50%, so they were not treating bacterial pneumonia.”

    “The age structure of the excess mortality has changed as you move into the vaccination period.”

    “These peaks occur in very specific hotspots, but synchronously around the world [..] that from an epidemiological standpoint is strictly impossible, because the time from seeding of an infection to the sudden rise of mortality is completely uncertain.”

    “The virus absolutely refused to cross these borders, of course, this is absurd, a viral respiratory disease is believed to spread, and it does not need a passport, and it does not respect borders, so that’s yet another proof, that this is not a viral respiratory pandemic.”

    “You see, as a consequence of the vaccine rollout, there’s a higher regime of mortality.”

    “Same thing for each of the states in Australia.”

    “The large peak [in the southern US] coincides with [the] vaccine equity [program].”

    “You are injecting people, that are at high risk of dying when you inject the elderly”

    “Young adults, are above the exponential [risk]. There’s a plateau of risk of dying for young adults.”

    Dr. Rancourt concluded his testimony by stating that from his detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the covid period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

    • If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality.
    • There was no pandemic causing excess mortality.
    • Measures caused excess mortality.
    • Covid vaccination caused excess mortality.

    Last week, Dr. Rancourt published an essay titled ‘There Was No Pandemic’ which is based on his testimony for the NCI (see video below), his 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony and his continued research.  In his essay, he wrote:

    Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

    In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents.  In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2,000 injections, to increase exponentially with age … We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.

    There Was No Pandemic, Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, 22 June 2023

    *

    Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    Featured image is from The Expose

    READ MORE:

    https://fb.watch/pbew4YC1Ih/

     

     


    The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

    by Michel Chossudovsky

    Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

    “My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

    ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0,  Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook,  Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

    Price: $11.50 Get yours for FREE! Click here to download.

    We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page