A 17 Year Old 2003 Coronavirus Categorized in February 2020 as a “New Virus”
First published on August 1, 2026. Expanded analysis (August 2-4, 2026)
Introduction
In recent development (September 2026), Canada’s Allison Inquiry (Initiative of Hon. Dean Allisson. MP) has interviewed 50 witnesses pertainiing to the Covid mRNA vaccine.
“Moms, dads, daughter, sons, brothers, sisters, grandparents, lawyers, doctors, cops, pilots, military veterans, a United States senator and just plain hard-working, honest Canadians.
They came into the capital from all across the country for one main reason – they just wanted to be heard.”
The political dimensions were not addressed, namely the decisions taken by the Ottawa government as well as the provincial authorities pertaining to the vaccine.
Canada’s Allison Inquiry
Opening statements: Hon Dean Allison, MP
The Canadian media casually ignored the significance of this important event.
Access to statements of key witnesses. Allison Inquiry Day 1-4 click image below
Our thanks to Hon. Dean Allison MP for his outstanding initiative.
A Parliamentary Investigation is envisaged.
Michel Chossudovsky, September 23, 2026
The U.S. Covid-19 Senate Hearings
The U.S. Senate Hearings suggest that a dangerous NEW VIRUS was detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019.
It was initially entitled 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.
On January 1, 2020, “the Chinese health authorities closed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan following Western media reports claiming that wild animals sold there may have been the source of the virus.”
As of early January 2020, it was the object of extensive media coverage coupled with an unfolding Worldwide fear campaign.
Media disinformation 24/7 went into high gear.
The Chinese authorities (allegedly) “identified a new type of virus” on January 7, 2020, using the RT-PCR test.
No specific details were provided regarding the process of isolation of the virus.”
The Mandate of the Senate Hearings
I have reviewed the latest statements of the Senate Hearings, including Dr. Peter McCullough‘s outstanding presentation.
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky “has long accused Dr. Fauci of trying to cover up the origin of the coronavirus, and of funding research at a lab in Wuhan in China.
Media reports have pointed to the so-called “origin of COVID-19” whereas:
“U.S. intelligence agencies are divided on the subject, with some supporting the possibility of the coronavirus emerging from an accidental lab leak in China while others support natural transmission from animal to human”.
Fauci previously said he keeps “an open mind as to what the origin is,” though he has also said he believes the animal-to-human route was more likely.”
In this article I will focus on two important issues which are of concern to the both the U.S. Senate Hearings and Canada’s Allison Inquiry
- The Identity and Origin of the New Corona Virus
- The Nature of the mRNA Vaccine and its Impacts
In both cases I will put forth careful factual analysis and supportive data from official sources.
The Most Devastating Crisis in Human History
This video was first published by Vimeo in March 2021. It was censored and taken down by Vimeo in May 2021.
It focusses on the first phase of the Covid Crisis including the launching of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020.
Starts At 6’47”. The video is also available at the foot of this article. It is also available (click here) with subtitles in 14 languages
Our thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada. 277k September 26, 2026, 160k+ views (subtitles version), also Bitchute version
.
I
.
The Identity and Origin of the New Corona Virus
Suggest you view the video prior to reading the Analysis
Video: The Virus that Never Existed?
Michel Chossudovsky, Interview with Caroline Mailloux, GRTV, Lux Media
To leave a comment or Access Rumble click here or lower right hand corner of screen
149k views September 23, 2026
Analysis of the New 2019 Corona Virus: 2019-nCoV
There were several name changes. The initial identity of the virus was 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.
In late January 2020, the WHO based on the analysis of the Berlin Virology Team (Eurosurveillance) confirmed that: It did not possess an isolate of 2019-nCoV from a purified sample from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the novel coronavirus:
“In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community.
We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.
Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness [of 2019-nCoV] to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.:”
.
.
Full Text of the Euro-Surveillance entitled 2019 Novel Corona Virus
.
This Eurosurveillance (01/20/20) report headed by Christian Drosten (Berlin Virology Institute) emphazises the “close genetic relatedness [of 2019-nCoV] to the 2003 SARS-CoV”, which suggests that the “NEW” virus entitled 2019-nCoV is “similar” to a virus entitled SARS-CoV 2003, which was the object of an indepth May 2003 study by the New England Journal of Medicine which is reviewed below.
The New England Journal of Medicine, May 2003 (NEJM):
The NEJM Study Pertaining to SARS-CoV 2003
“A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” which broke out in China’s Southern Guangdong Province in 2002 WAS identified and categorized as a “new virus” on May 15, 2003. (17 YEARS PRIOR to the Alleged Covid Outbreak)
See Screenshot 0f NEJM May 15 2003 article below:
.
The identification of the virus adopted in the NEJM (May 15, 2003) is as follows: (emphasis added)
“We received clinical specimens from patients in seven countries and tested them [2002-2003], using virus-isolation techniques, electron-microscopical and histologic studies, and molecular and serologic assays, in an attempt to identify a wide range of potential pathogens
“None of the previously described respiratory pathogens were consistently identified. However, a novel coronavirus was isolated from patients who met the case definition of SARS. … Electron-microscopical examination revealed ultrastructural features characteristic of coronaviruses. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining revealed reactivity with group I coronavirus polyclonal antibodies.
“Consensus coronavirus primers designed to amplify a fragment of the polymerase gene by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to obtain a sequence that clearly identified the isolate as a unique coronavirus only distantly related to previously sequenced coronaviruses.”
Isolate of “Novel Coronavirus 2003” (NEJM). Absence of Isolate of Novel 2019 Corona Virus. “2019-nCoV” (WHO)
While the 2003 SARS-CoV was duly isolated as documented in the NEJM, the WHO acknowledged in January 2020 that it did not have an isolate and purified sample of the NEW 2019 coronavirus from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the 2019 novel coronavirus entitled 2019-nCoV.
It should be noted that, the EuroScience Report conducted by the Berlin Virology Institute in liason with the WHO confirmed numerous cases of sick patients, while pointing out that “no virus isolates were available” (see bebelow)
“As at 20 January 2020*, 282 laboratory-confirmed human cases have been notified to WHO [5]. Confirmed cases in travellers from Wuhan were announced on 13 and 17 January in Thailand as well as on 15 January in Japan and 19 January in Korea.”
Not Wuhan! Berlin
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Virology
Following advice from Bill Gates, the WHO Director General Dr. Tedros was in liaison with the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital. Under the scientific guidance of Dr. Christian Drosten, a decision was reached concerning the alleged identity of the New Virus.
How was this matter addressed under the auspices of the WHO?
The Berlin Virology Institute study firmly acknowledged that: “[While]… several viral genome sequences had been released,… virus isolates or samples [of 2019-nCoV] from infected patients were not available …”
What the Berlin team recommended to the WHO was that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003 SARS-CoV virus should be used as a “proxy” (point of reference) of the novel 2019 coronavirus:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens.
Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).
What this ambiguous statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “COVID-19 confirmed cases” (aka infection resulting from the 2019 novel coronavirus) would be validated by its “close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV.”
How could the new virus be categorized as “similar” without having been identified, i.e. without an “isolate” from an infected patient? Moreover, bear in mind that while the PCR test does not detect the virus, it detects genetic fragments (of numerous viruses).
Smoking Gun. Bill Gates to the Rescue of Dr. Tedros
What this means is that a coronavirus detected in 2002-2003 in Guangdong Province (2003 SARS-CoV) has been used to “validate” the identity of a so-called “novel coronavirus” allegedly detected in China’s Hubei Province in late December 2019.
The recommendations of the Drosten team of the Berlin Virology Institute (supported by a grant of $249,550 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ) were then transmitted to the WHO.
They were endorsed by the Director-General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
The WHO did not have in its possession the “virus isolate” required to identify the new virus.
“Never mind”. It was decided by the Berlin Virology Team on behalf of the WHO that an isolate of the new coronavirus was not required.
It stands to reason that if the PCR test uses the 2003 SARS-CoV virus as a proxy or “point of reference”, there can be no “confirmed” cases pertaining to the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV.
In early February. 2020, following the failure to identify the novel coronavirus, a decision was taken to change its name to: SARS-CoV-2
February 11, 2020. The Alleged “New Virus” is Renamed
“Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus”: SARS-CoV-2 which (according to the WHO) is “similar” to a 20 year old virus entitled: 2003-SARS-CoV.
SARS-CoV-2: A 17 Year Old 2003 Coronavirus Categorized in February 2020 as a “New Virus”? Scientific Nonsense!
There was “Similarity” but there Was No “New Corona Virus”?
I should mention that while SARS-CoV-2 is not a New Virus, this does exclude the possibility that “other viruses” created in a laboratory could have been released.
The SARS-CoV-2 virus was confirmed on February 11, 2020 (see above). A week later, following the February 11, 2020 decision to rename the virus, was addressed by 27 scientists public healh professionals medical doctors in the Lancet Letter of February 19, 2020 (also referred to as Calisher et al. 2020) was published.
- Dr Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Chief Medical Advisor to the U.S. President (2021-2022)
- Dr. George Gao Fu, Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China’s CDC) (August 2017 to July 2022, Fellow of the Wellcome Trust
- Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
- Dr. Christian Drosten, Director of the Institute of Virology, Charité Hospital, Berlin.
- Bill Gates, Director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Philanthropic support to the WHO and The Berlin Institute of Virology’s study in Eurosurveillance
- U.S. President Donald Trump
- President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen
The WHO decision pertainng to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was endorsed in the U.S by the Trump Administration, while placing the blame on China.
In the EU, it was endorsed in March 2020 by the President of the European Commission Ursula von Der Leyen (2019- )
The World Economic Forum (WEF) Meetings in Davos in the Swiss Alps in mid January 2020 played a key role.
The Director General of the WHO Dr. Tedros was present at the meetings in Davos Switzerland.
A couple of weeks later, the WHO Director General’s Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus took the decision on January 30, 2020, to call for a Worldwide Public Health Emergency of International Concern, based on 83 confirmed positive PCR cases outside China for a population of approximately 6.4 billion people.
Screenshot from WHO, January 29, 2020.
Number of confirmed positive cases in US, Canada, France and Germany
January 31, 2020: President Trump’s Decision to Suspend Air Travel with China
On the following day (January 31, 2020), President Trump announced that he would deny entry to the US of both Chinese and foreign nationals “who have traveled in China in the last 14 days”. This immediately triggered a crisis in air travel, transportation, US-China trade relations as well as freight and shipping transactions.
Whereas the WHO “[did] not recommend any travel or trade restrictions,” the five so-called “confirmed cases” in the US (see WHO table above) were sufficient to “justify” President Trump’s January 31st, 2020 decision t to suspend air travel with China while precipitating a hate campaign against ethnic Chinese throughout the Western world.
This historic January 31st decision paved the way for the disruption of international commodity trade as well as for the imposition of worldwide restrictions on air travel. It was eventually instrumental in spearheading the bankruptcy of major airlines.
In retrospect, President Trump’s statement was of a geopolitical nature.
“Fake media” immediately went into high gear. China was held responsible for “spreading infection” worldwide.
Three weeks later at a press conference on the 20th of February 2020 the WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus intimated that the pandemic was imminent:
“[I am] concerned that the chance to contain the coronavirus outbreak was “closing” … I believe the window of opportunity is still there, but that the window is narrowing.” (emphasis added)
What was the evidence put forth by Dr. Tedros in support of his bold statement? On February 20, 2020, there were only 1076 confirmed [cumulative] cases outside China.
Click Screenshot below to enlarge (Tedros’ opening remarks at media briefing)
“Outside China there are now 1076 cases in 20 countries, with a total of seven deaths….
….Of all cases outside China, more than half are among passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship“
Official Statement of WHO Director General Dr. Tedros, Geneva, 20 February 2020,
March 11, 2020. The Pandemic is launched
Important References
By , August 04, 2026
There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic
By , July 31, 2026
.
.
II
.
The Nature of the mRNA Vaccine and its Impacts
.
The “Classified” Pfizer Report
.
.
Already in early 2021, the Classified “Secret” Report by Pfizer based on data (mortality, morbidity) collected on behalf of Pfizer from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 had been submitted to the U.S. health authorities.
The Pfizer-Moderna mRNA “Vaccine” was endorsed by the Trump Adminstration in December 2020.
The Senate Hearings have failed to address the relevance of the Classified Pfizer Report which confirmed the impacts of the mRNA vaccine on mortality and morbidity from the very onset in early 2021.
Sections of the so-called “secret” (classified) report were released under Freedom of Information (FOI) in October 2021, nine months following the launching of the vaccine in early January 2021.
That report “says everything”, it comes from the horse’s mouth. It’s their data. Yet medical doctors hesitate to quote Pfizer’s data for obvious reasons.
It is essential that this Pfizer report be addressed by the Hearings.
This interview of Michel Chossudovsky with Caroline Mailloux focussing on Pfizer’s mRNA Vaccine, was conducted on February 24, 2023
To leave a comment or to share the video (Twitter, Facebook, etc. click rumble on the lower right hand corner
22k views August 3, 2026
The Objective of the Classified Pfizer Report
Tabulate and categorize detailed data pertaining to the impacts of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine on, Mortality, Morbidity and Adverse Events from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021. namely two and a half months.
The results of Pfizer’s classified Report were not made public. They were available to several health agencies (including the CDC, NIAID and FDA) involved in overseeing the distribution of the vaccine under the clauses of “Emergency Use Authorization”.
Bear in mind, this is Pfizer’s own data.
This Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure provided data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in mid December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).
The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was launched in the US on the 14th of December 2020 after the granting of Emergency Use Authorization on December 11, 2020.
In a twisted irony, the data revealed in this “insider report” confirms mortality and morbidity.
The alleged “vaccine” is a dangerous drug.
It also refutes the official vaccine narrative peddled by the governments and the WHO.
EXCERPT OF CLASSIFIED PFIZER REPORT
.
As shown in Figure 1 [see below], the System Organ Classes (SOCs) that contained the greatest number (≥2%) of events, in the overall dataset, were General disorders and administration site conditions (51,335 AEs),
Nervous system disorders (25,957), Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (17,283), Gastrointestinal disorders (14,096),
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (8,476), Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (8,848), Infections and infestations (4,610), Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (5,590), and Investigations (3,693)
emphasis added
Pfizer Has a Criminal Record
Of significance, never mentioned by the media or acknowledged by our governments, Pfizer is the only Pharmaceutical Company which has a criminal record with the US Department of Justice.
To consult the Department of Justice’ historic decision click screenshot below
This is something which has to be addressed by the Senate Hearings. Pfizer has a Criminal record
.
2009 DOJ 2.3 Billion Heath Care Settlement: Pfizer’s CEOs Were not Arrested. They were Put on “Probation” by the U.S. DOJ
Who are the main actors behind the Pfizer-Moderna 2021 mRNA Killer “Vaccine”.
It’s a Criminal Undertaking: .
- Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer, Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer has a criminal record with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Stéphane Bancel, French billionaire, Chief Executive officer (CEO) of Moderna,
- Bill Gates, Philanthropist and Director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
- Dr Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
- U.S. President Donald Trump: Operation Warp Speed
- President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen
Dr. Albert Bourla, President Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy Jr.
Click Here to read the Pfizer Full Year 2022 Revenues Report
above link no longer active
The link to the complete report has been removed by Pfizer.
Crimes against Humanity Worldwide
Who are The “Good Guys”? Who Are the Criminals?
President Trump Endorses Pfizer (which has a Criminal Record under the U.S. Department of Justice)
“We agree with President Trump about the role data and transparency play in helping to inform patients and providers about their decision to vaccinate,”
Pfizer Chief Executive Officer Albert Bourla said in a statement:
When Crimes against Humanity at the Level of the Entire Planet are Rewarded …
“In response 
to a call from President Donald Trump to make the positive impact of Covid-19 vaccines public, drug giant Pfizer posted a collection of more than 200 news releases and statements and 27 peer-reviewed data publications since early 2020.
“President Trump’s call for transparency is welcomed, and we remain deeply committed to that principle,” Pfizer Chief Executive Officer Albert Bourla said in a statement Wednesday.
“Transparency has always been a cornerstone of trust, and we are continuing to provide clear, factual data to the public.” (reported by CNN, September 3, 2025)
.
By , July 29, 2026
Our video production focusses on the criminality behind the Pfizer mRNA vaccine under “Operation Warp Speed”
We propose:
- The immediate repeal and withdrawal of the vaccine Worldwide in the 193 member states of the United Nations.
- The launching of class action criminal lawsuits Worldwide against Pfizer
.
Video: Original in English.
Subtitles in 14 languages. Click to access (hyperlinks)
August 5, 2026: 36k+ views
English, Français, عربي, Русский, Español, 中文, Deutsch, Farsi, Português, Italiano, 日本語, 한국어, Türkçe, Српски.
References
Video: The Pfizer “Killer Vaccine”: “Money vs. Mortality”. Michel Chossudovsky
By , August 01, 2026
By , April 12, 2026
There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic
By , July 31, 2026
The Most Devastating Crisis in Human History
This video was first published by Vimeo in March 2021. It was censored and taken down by Vimeo in May 2021. It focusses on the first phase of the Covid Crisis.
Starts At 6’47”. The video is also available at the foot of this article. It is also available (click here) with subtitles in 14 languages
Our thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada
Michel Chossudovsky’s Message
Dear Readers,
We stand in solidarity Worldwide.
We endorse the 2026 U.S. Senate’s Hearings pertaining to the Covid-19 pandemic and the mRNA Vaccine.
My writings on the Covid crisis have been the object of censorship.
Below you can download (free of charge) my Book (15 chapters) (April 2026) which provides a detailed analysis of a crisis which is still ongoing.
First published four years ago in August 2022. Print version in Japanese.
Bring it to the consideration of the Senate Hearings.
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
Free of Charge for ALL our Readers. Click here to Download
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.
We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.
About the Author
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research.
He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social inequality.
He has also undertaken research in Health Economics on behalf of the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA, UNDP, CIDA, WHO, etc. Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983).
He is the author of 13 books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015).
He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at editorglobalresearch@yahoo.com
See Michel Chossudovsky, Biographical Note,
Michel Chossudovsky’s Articles on Global Research
