Original Link Here: 9/11: Is There an Alternative Narrative? False Flag – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
How did the media approach 911? They read from the same script. It was basically a Pentagon script. Dissent was obliterated.
They ignored evidence from first responder firefighters who talked about explosions: boom boom boom boom boom boom boom.
Then there’s World Trade Center 7. The official narrative, which is really quite ridiculous is that it came down on its own and there’s videos of this (WTC 7) coming down on its own “from office fires”. That’s ridiculous, that’s not what office fires do. It was a clear, one of the perpetrators said “Let’s pull it.”
Well it was a controlled demolition architects and engineers there’s a whole group there of architects and engineers (Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth) who have debunked the official narrative. The building came down in its own footprint so did the other buildings, they exploded there was explosion and there were squibs and they came down That doesn’t mean planes didn’t hit the other buildings, they did as far as I can tell, but when a plane hits a building like that, never never before in history has that happened where a plane hit a skyscraper like that and bear in mind the reinforcing steel (beams) are on the perimeter of these skyscrapers. Never, ever never ever have buildings come down like that as a result of planes hitting them. So there’s all sorts of discrepancies between the official narrative and alternate narratives including Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth… Richard Gage. Former Prof, uh who has now passed away Graeme McQueen did a lot of research into the media deception.
If we had a more democratic media they would have aired testimonies from more of the first responders who said
“We heard explosions boom boom boom boom boom we saw this we saw that.”
But that wasn’t the game plan, the game plan was to declare an emergency to first of all to arouse emotions in the public and then to subvert democracy by declaring an emergency based upon a false flag and then to wage a war against so-called terrorists where our countries actually support the terrorists so that gives a Carte Blanche to invade almost any country. All you have to do is say, Well look al Qaeda’s there. Well, excuse me, those are as per Tulsi Gabbard and many others and much western-supported evidence, but most certainly in Syria, the al-Qaeda, ISIS and affiliates are western strategic assets, proxies. And another proof would be the the current government well the imposed junta, it’s an al-Qaeda junta, which was basically installed. Now some people will say this, Well there was this bounty on his head. I see that as a smokescreen. … James Jeffrey (former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and Turkey) said they gave this guy a waiver. They’ve been grooming him (Julani) for what has happened, the catastrophe that they have delivered, which is a regime change.
Things that’s been happening after 9/11 is just that the wider discussion not only you know in like the mainstream media also it’s wider open for the independent media also like mainly the discussions are like no no it’s not an inside job it’s like it’s it’s happened the official account you know was right and all that, so obviously do you think people like you who came up with a different narrative very different from the mainstream media and all and obviously contrary to some of the so-called independent media or the independent media who they claim they are is just different to them but uh because of censorship these details will never come out in the open?
You don’t have to agree with me but it’d be nice if we could have an open discussion which we don’t we don’t have an open discussion and that’s where the censorship is and that’s how they frame dissent, they negate open discussion. It should be a democratic discussion where it’s not just the Pentagon’s position and tactics that prevail.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Mark Taliano is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) and the author of Voices from Syria, Global Research Publishers, 2017. He writes on his website where this article was originally published.
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.
